• Global Anti-Corruption Practice

Case Detail

In re Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (2019)

Case Details
  • Case Name
  • In re Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (2019)
  • Date Filed
  • 02/13/2019
  • Enforcement Agency
  • DOJ
  • Foreign Official
  • Unnamed government officials in India. 
  • Date of Conduct
  • 2014 to 2015
  • Nature of Business
  • Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (“Cognizant”) is a global information technology services provider, headquartered in Teaneck, N.J. 

  • Influence to be Obtained
  • According to the DOJ, Cognizant and its subsidiary in India violated the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal accounting controls provisions.  Cognizant, through its senior management, allegedly authorized a contractor to pay bribes to various government officials in India to secure permits and licensing for various development projects in India.  These payments were later reimbursed to the contractor under the pretense of paying construction invoices that were falsified.

  • Enforcement
  • On February 13, 2019, the DOJ issued a declination letter, explaining that it had declined to prosecute Cognizant for these alleged violations under the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.  The DOJ noted that this decision was informed by various factors: Cognizant promptly and voluntarily disclosed the violations once the Board discovered the conduct, Cognizant conducted a “thorough and comprehensive investigation” and made efforts to cooperate with the DOJ, Cognizant’s compliance program and the continued improvements instituted by the company, and Cognizant’s “full remediation” by terminating and disciplining the individuals involved.

    Cognizant agreed to disgorge $19,370,561 in connection with the alleged bribery, and the DOJ agreed to credit the disgorgement the company pays to the SEC (not including any prejudgment interest).

    On February 15, 2019, the SEC settled its enforcement action against Cognizant for violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal accounting controls provisions.  Cognizant was ordered to pay a disgorgement fee of $16,394,351, prejudgment interest of $2,773,017, and a civil monetary penalty of $6,000,000.

  • Amount of the Value
  • Not stated.
  • Amount of Business Related to Payment
  • Not stated.
  • Intermediary
  • Contractor.
  • Citizenship of Parent Entity
  • United States
  • Total Sanction
  • $ 19,370,561
  • Compliance Monitor
  • No
  • Reporting Requirements
  • No
  • Case is Pending?
  • No
  • Total Combined Monetary Sanction
  • $ 25,167,374

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

  • Citation
  • In re Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Letter to Karl Buch and Kathryn Ruemmler from Craig Carpenito, US Attorney of the District of New Jersey and Robert Zink, Acting Chief Fraud Section, DOJ (Feb. 13, 2019).
  • Date Filed
  • 02/13/2019
  • Filed Under Seal
  • No
  • Date Case Was Unsealed
  • 02/13/2019
  • FCPA Statutory Provision
  • Other Statutory Provision
  • Not stated.
  • Disposition
  • Public Declination with Disgorgement, Public Declination with Disgorgement
  • Defendant Jurisdictional Basis
  • Domestic Concern
  • Defendant's Citizenship
  • United States
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below:
Material on www.shearman.com is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. Contacting us by email does not create a lawyer-client relationship unless and until we have agreed to handle a particular matter. Please do not convey to us any information you regard as confidential unless and until a formal lawyer-client relationship has been established, as any information we receive from you prior to such time will not be confidential.
Accept Cancel